auwustories

Open full view…

The move to dock fine out of dole payments

antidolerebutt
Sun, 07 Jan 2018 01:09:24 GMT

How The Australian Media Divides And Controls Us. Simple, they do it by focusing our attention on the shortcomings of a sub group of fellow Australians. Some Australian subgroups who have been targets of this divide and control tactic include alleged bikie gangs, alleged street gangs, smokers, drinkers, speeders, environmentalists, welfare recipients (but not corporate welfare recipients) renters, (but not landlords) the obese, the unfit, workers, compensation claimants (but not employers or insurance companies.) The media's attempts to divide and control and thereby pit Australians against Australians, has now reached a point where they are now inventing alleged subgroups of wrongdoers so they can vilify and criminalize that subgroup. In very recent times we have seen the emergence of a new subgroup called "fine evaders" The media is now focusing our attention on this group and wants us to support the government who wants to dock people’s welfare payments to recover ‘what the media claims is 'lost revenue.' Mind you, such docking will quickly spread to include wages and salaries because why would it not spread to wages and salaries. Some question arise here. How does someone by not paying a fine, that is illegal and void as per section 8, sub-section 12 of the Imperial Acts Application Act, until conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction, deprive anyone of any money anyway? Until we have been found guilty of an alleged infringement in a court of competent jurisdiction, we are guilty of absolutely nothing. Another question arises here which is why is the media so desperate to focus our attention on this sub group of so-called "fine evaders" vilify them, make out they are criminals of such elk that we should feel compelled to support the docking of their wages, salaries or dole? A further question that arises here is why and for whom does the media divide out a subgroup of Australians, vilify that subgroup for the purposes of pitting Australian against Australians, if it's not for the purpose of dividing and controlling people? The conclusion here is that we can now easily recognize how the media picks out subgroups of the Australian people, vilifies them and encourages the rest of Australians to vilify them unless it's for the purpose of dividing and controlling them. Is the purpose of this to prevent the Australian people from unifying their collective and potent potential to take back control of Australia's future? This is how they get away with things like this. Summarised in one sentence, they do it by focusing our attention on the shortcomings of a sub group of fellow Australians and get us to think what they want us to think about that subgroup and so we will then support the governments intentions. This is how they are controlling us. Some Australian subgroups who have been targets of this divide and control tactic include alleged bikie gangs, alleged street gangs, smokers, drinkers, speeders, environmentalists, welfare recipients (but not corporate welfare recipients) renters, (but not landlords) the obese, the unfit, workers, compensation claimants (but not employers or insurance companies.) The media's attempts to divide and control and thereby pit Australians against Australians, has now reached a point where they are now inventing alleged subgroups of wrongdoers so they can vilify and criminalize that subgroup. In very recent times we have seen the emergence of a new subgroup called "fine evaders" The media is now focusing our attention on this group and wants us to support the government who wants to dock people’s welfare payments to recover ‘what the media claims is 'lost revenue.' Mind you, such docking will quickly spread to include wages and salaries because why would it not spread to wages and salaries. Some question arise here. How does someone by not paying a fine, that is illegal and void as per section 8, sub-section 12 of the Imperial Acts Application Act, until conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction, deprive anyone of any money anyway? Until we have been found guilty of an alleged infringement in a court of competent jurisdiction, we are guilty of absolutely nothing. Another question arises here which is why is the media so desperate to focus our attention on this sub group of so-called "fine evaders" vilify them, make out they are criminals of such elk that we should feel compelled to support the docking of their wages, salaries or dole? A further question that arises here is why and for whom does the media divide out a subgroup of Australians, vilify that subgroup for the purposes of pitting Australian against Australians, if it's not for the purpose of dividing, controlling, and to keep us at each others throats? The conclusion here is that we can now easily recognize how the media picks out subgroups of the Australian people, vilifies them and encourages the rest of Australians to vilify them unless it's for the purpose of dividing and controlling them. Is the purpose of this to prevent the Australian people from unifying their collective and potent potential to take back control of Australia's future? This is how they get away with things like this. Summarised in one sentence, they do it by focusing our attention on the shortcomings of a sub group of fellow Australians and get us to think what they want us to think about that subgroup and so we will then support the governments intentions. This is how they are controlling us. Some Australian subgroups who have been targets of this divide and control tactic include alleged bikie gangs, alleged street gangs, smokers, drinkers, speeders, environmentalists, welfare recipients (but not corporate welfare recipients) renters, (but not landlords) the obese, the unfit, workers, compensation claimants (but not employers or insurance companies.) The media's attempts to divide and control and thereby pit Australians against Australians, has now reached a point where they are now inventing alleged subgroups of wrongdoers so they can vilify and criminalize that subgroup. In very recent times we have seen the emergence of a new subgroup called "fine evaders" The media is now focusing our attention on this group and wants us to support the government who wants to dock people’s welfare payments to recover ‘what the media claims is 'lost revenue.' Mind you, such docking will quickly spread to include wages and salaries because why would it not spread to wages and salaries. Some question arise here. How does someone by not paying a fine, that is illegal and void as per section 8, sub-section 12 of the Imperial Acts Application Act, until conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction, deprive anyone of any money anyway? Until we have been found guilty of an alleged infringement in a court of competent jurisdiction, we are guilty of absolutely nothing. Another question arises here which is why is the media so desperate to focus our attention on this sub group of so-called "fine evaders" vilify them, make out they are criminals of such elk that we should feel compelled to support the docking of their wages, salaries or dole? A further question that arises here is why and for whom does the media divide out a subgroup of Australians, vilify that subgroup for the purposes of pitting Australian against Australians, if it's not for the purpose of dividing, controlling, and to keep us at each others throats? The conclusion here is that we can now easily recognize how the media picks out subgroups of the Australian people, vilifies them and encourages the rest of Australians to vilify them unless it's for the purpose of dividing and controlling them. Is the purpose of this to prevent the Australian people from unifying their collective and potent potential to take back control of Australia's future? This is how they get away with things like this. Summarised in one sentence, they do it by focusing our attention on the shortcomings of a sub group of fellow Australians and get us to think what they want us to think about that subgroup and so we will then support the governments intentions. This is how they are controlling us. Some Australian subgroups who have been targets of this divide and control tactic include alleged bikie gangs, alleged street gangs, smokers, drinkers, speeders, environmentalists, welfare recipients (but not corporate welfare recipients) renters, (but not landlords) the obese, the unfit, workers, compensation claimants (but not employers or insurance companies.) The media's attempts to divide and control and thereby pit Australians against Australians, has now reached a point where they are now inventing alleged subgroups of wrongdoers so they can vilify and criminalize that subgroup. In very recent times we have seen the emergence of a new subgroup called "fine evaders" The media is now focusing our attention on this group and wants us to support the government who wants to dock people’s welfare payments to recover ‘what the media claims is 'lost revenue.' Mind you, such docking will quickly spread to include wages and salaries because why would it not spread to wages and salaries. Some question arise here. How does someone by not paying a fine, that is illegal and void as per section 8, sub-section 12 of the Imperial Acts Application Act, until conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction, deprive anyone of any money anyway? Until we have been found guilty of an alleged infringement in a court of competent jurisdiction, we are guilty of absolutely nothing. Another question arises here which is why is the media so desperate to focus our attention on this sub group of so-called "fine evaders" vilify them, make out they are criminals of such elk that we should feel compelled to support the docking of their wages, salaries or dole? A further question that arises here is why and for whom does the media divide out a subgroup of Australians, vilify that subgroup for the purposes of pitting Australian against Australians, if it's not for the purpose of dividing, controlling, and to keep us at each others throats? The conclusion here is that we can now easily recognize how the media picks out subgroups of the Australian people, vilifies them and encourages the rest of Australians to vilify them unless it's for the purpose of dividing and controlling them. Is the purpose of this to prevent the Australian people from unifying their collective and potent potential to take back control of Australia's future?

katez
Sun, 07 Jan 2018 03:36:07 GMT

My suspicion is that the media, largely controlled by Murdoch press in Australia run a proportion of the political agenda and vice versa. . Essentially Rupert Murdoch's press, Newscorp I think?, has been working with conservative agenda political parties for around 30 years to damage the reputation and human worth of any group of people who don't fit with their view of the world. Which really ends up being most of the usual suspect slave drivers like the Reinharts, the Packers etc. People outside the relatively small proportion of the population made up by these intolerable misanthropes and their minions are all fair game as soon as they voice any opposition to the cultural ethos of "work-spend-consume" or dare to suggest that there might be more to life than these singular activities. Murdoch is a mean old man who can best be analyzed through his twitter account which, a bit like Trump, demonstrates his core viewpoints which are generally nasty. I notice that Murdoch press occasionally does whip up a progressive story line but it seems to use this tactic to enforce th e opposing view of antisocial, individualist rhetoric and which is tended by people such as Alan Jones and Bolt and is generally in opposition to social protections and peoples well being in general . The fact that life is a complex affair is avoided at all costs by the media acting in service to political parties in Australia. The media in Australia is a function of parties and also functions to shape parties. Media and Government are in it together whether journalists are aware of this or not (most presumably most are aware ) and is used to express opposing opinions, never allowing a more complex analysis of life to take place, never finding common goals, drives, needs and aspirations. Simone Weil pointed out the nature of political parties and the use of political media in her pamphlet "Notes on the abolition of all political parties" in 1934, nothing has changed since then, the situation has merely intensified and the observations made by such brilliant analyzers of political parties, (Dickens is another pretty astute observer of the Anglo Saxon political style), regarding the division of people along the lines of wealth, poverty and politics in general has been used by politicians and the media to sure up the endless oppositional framework that our lives are shaped by. Developing a deep hatred of political parties and of the media is healthy way to approach the matter, neither of these institutions are not concerned with us or our health, our spirit and creativity or the wellbeing of our immediate environments, the world that sustains us, but instead always works to sure up the continual expansion of the two institutions: political parties and media enterprise.