pttresearch

Open full view…

Is it time to wave the white flag on AERO?

Jorge
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:57:55 GMT

This stock has gotten crushed in the last 6-12 months. I think with a substantial loss like this (greater than 65% decline) a follow up article is warranted. It is not enough to say no news is no change, it just isn't. My only protection is the small position as per The Methodology but nevertheless, this kind of performance is horrific. This kind of a decrease in valuation requires a re-examination of the thesis and an update to the paying subscribers. Regards, Jorge

Samuel
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:28:13 GMT

I've been asking for an update / refresh on the AERO thesis and the potential take-out price by SMG for weeks. No response.

Shallum
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:18:20 GMT

sometimes it takes more than 12 months for a stock to start getting market recognition. If you read the quarterly, you know that they are growing, expanding operations, and increasing sales. All that generates a positive company movement. That does not instantly reflect in the Market, especially in a market like we find ourselves currently in.

Michael
Thu, 07 Jan 2016 03:08:29 GMT

Aero is still a buyout candidate. At this point what do you have to loose. Be patient with this stock. If it doubles or triples from here better than selling at a buck. May surprise us. Wait and be patient!

kurt
Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:13:49 GMT

It will be interesting to see how the holiday sales period turns out and then what the return rate is for the AEROGARDEN since that was an issue last year.

Eric
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:20:29 GMT

Just looked at Mark's portfolio. Did not realize he sold all his AERO.

KAMRAN
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:10:36 GMT

Another pump and dump, leaving his subscribers holding the proverbial bag while he moved on, knowing that this company has no potential.

Shawn
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:54:32 GMT

He did not sell his AERO, it's at half a percent allocation and he's said he wasn't going to show half percent positions a video or two ago.

Alan
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 14:18:48 GMT

@Shawn - I agree with your assessment, that he may not be showing it as it is 0.5% or lower. However, to me, this seems a bit irresponsible of him. For such a thinly traded stock, to make his followers think that might have exited is dangerous, as a rush to the exit could send it plummeting. He knows this. So he has found a way to not show us what his AERO position is. Who knows what his thoughts are on AERO anymore. He keeps these purely to himself. But I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if he says "he got out on a recent bounce" to help pad his stats at some point in the future. Equally, I wouldn't be surprised to hear him say he was a buyer below $1 if it ends up recovering. There's no transparency (deliberately).

Gregory
Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:20:07 GMT

> @Alan > However, to me, this seems a bit irresponsible of him shocker!

John
Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:03:47 GMT

The bottom line is that WE HAVE BEEN HAD (one way or another) and some are still hanging around in hopes of seeing what crumbs might still be handed down to them by those who caused the whiplash. Beware of the Stockholm syndrome! That would be the icing on the cake. IMO there is only one way to handle this, no matter how these two entities are structured = Legal council.

kurt
Tue, 02 Feb 2016 02:17:55 GMT

His latest portfolio from his pipeline data subscription shows shorts with less than 1% holdings but his longs do not show the same level of details. Makes one think he has truly sold AERO and anything else in that same realm. Otherwise, why not show those longs which are less than 1%. Just my 2 cents.

Jorge
Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:29:18 GMT

I agree with John. Something should be done...

first page
previous