upandvanished

Open full view…

Jackson - Denno hearing

realnachosnow
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:20:58 GMT

Thoughts on Ryan Duke’s legal team questioning the validity or legality of his, now not so alleged, confession

bishere
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:56:26 GMT

Os, credit card could be a check card. Anybody with a checking account has one. My teenage children have them.

emphasisonlife
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:56:43 GMT

Agree, Bishere. Though just to be clear, I’m referring to the other contact Bo claimed he and Ryan had. He claimed Ryan contacted him out of the blue, but I doubt that, considering the GBI spoke with Bo in Wilcox county in 2016, then, according to Shoudel’s testimony maybe sometime after the GBI received the tip from Brooke’s friend. Shoudel seemed very unsure of the timeframe, and Bo told “Sally” in March 2017 it was “about a year ago.” So I guess sometime between 2017 and before the GBI called Bo in the 2nd time. (I don’t consider Bo reliable, but he told LE and someone else so I think it’s likely partially true.)

emphasisonlife
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:07:58 GMT

Ugh. *sometime between 2016* and before the GBI called Bo in the second time.

realnachosnow
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:26:49 GMT

@Os I can’t help but notice you try to insert Ben into a lot of your comments and posts. You are aware now that Ben’s DNA was not proven to be on the glove and that it was such a small amount of DNA that was recovered that it was impossible to say for certain that it wasn’t Bo or Bens, correct? I wonder how many other’s DNA was tested for a match on that third sample in question collect and if only those were the two that could not be ruled out. Hopefully soon that will be addressed

SlickWilly
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:30:17 GMT

Her and the GBI both Os

emphasisonlife
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:32:27 GMT

Didn’t they clarify in the hearing that all the other DNA samples taken were able to be ruled out except for those two that showed inconclusive? Regardless, as I said earlier it could just be transferred from something touched.

Catwoman (daystar)
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:35:28 GMT

or someone touched.

emphasisonlife
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:36:35 GMT

^that too.

sandiebirdie
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:46:14 GMT

Well let’s ask @slick and see if he is willing to share all of the usernames he has used on this DB. @slick? I can only speak for myself but fairly certain no one cares to hear your rationale of WHY (bc we know why) - but no doubt ALL are interested in ALL of your usernames. Would you please share the list @slick .... or do prefer to continue the DECEPTION you’ve thrown such a fit over being the victim of? Accusing others of, including ME.

Catwoman (daystar)
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:49:48 GMT

Pot, meet Kettle.

bishere
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:51:12 GMT

Never fails... 😏🤷🏻‍♀️

SlickWilly
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:54:58 GMT

Idk about a list but this is the only account I use here. I had another one a long time ago, it got banned. I gave Donald some shit under a fake acct during that day or two or however long it was. But before the board shut down and after it came back up this is the only account I've been using. So that's 3 and only one out of the 3 was a BS acct. that was giving the UAV people some shit for the whole hacked Jim Deal incident. .

SlickWilly
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:56:25 GMT

I wanna say Lindy/Eminem made that account for me but tbh it's been so long ago I can't recall exactly

sandiebirdie
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:04:42 GMT

Oh really? You’re both wrong. I have ONE. I wouldn’t be interested in talking to either of you per se but WOULD chat with a few others by cell -like fellow Atlantans (PL and his crew), Marcus, a few others but they already know😉or can easily check! Nice try of distracting tho @slick - we’ll wait...

georgia1234
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:08:00 GMT

What relevance to Tara's case is all of this back and forth about user names? Can we get back to the discussion of the hearing, DNA, etc.?

SlickWilly
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:08:28 GMT

Ok you hire someone(a PI, Geek Squad, he'll even the GBi) to come comb my phone for UAV user aliases. If they will meet in person at my lawyers office I'll be more than willing to let them seek for the answers you are seeking.

sandiebirdie
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:08:47 GMT

The relevance is DECEPTION.

SlickWilly
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:09:56 GMT

Coincidentally the same thesis Lindy wrote a about🤔 "Deception"

emphasisonlife
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:10:02 GMT

@sandie, dm me your number and I’ll give you a call to put all this to rest.

georgia1234
Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:13:56 GMT

@nacho - or anyone else who knows - Question for you - why would the prosecution wait to have the glove tested further for Bo's DNA? Is that standard procedure to wait until closer to trial? I found that odd but wasn't sure if there was some legal reason I wasn't privy to?

previous
next
last page