That's not what this thread is about - that was a total side note. But, either way, I don't see anyone changing their minds about who killed Tara at this point without more evidence. We have all come to the conclusions we have come to with what we have had for the last year...only new information, whether from a confession, testimony, or discover will change anything at this junction in the case.
Also, of COURSE the prosecutors think he's involved. Someone's gotta take the blame.
*discovery. Not discover. ^^
Anyway, so Uncle Bobby. That would not have made his wife very happy. Not at all. Do we think she knew?
I’m not trying to change minds or hearts on whom should be held responsible. That is up to those who look at the facts. Little as there may be at this moment it’s still very important to not disregard the tangible facts and soundbites from those connected to this case in order to push forward a narrative one wishes to be true
A few of the people active here in the past week or however long it's been back have been hot & heavy looking into this case for the last year since the DB has been gone/podcast has been on hiatus. Locals, those on the other side of the country (me), and everywhere in between. I am sure you have done your own research. I know you aren't trying to change anyone's minds, but holy crap has my mind changed a few times since this sh*tstorm started for me last May. This is the most logical explanation yet, supported by well-documented and well-organized "evidence" that we have gleaned over the past however many months. There is a lot more than you think - that we can be sure of. That's why I am stuck on this version. There is no definite version of events, timeline, or even evidence that Ryan is 100% innocent. I just don't want anyone thinking that this is a lighthearted "save Ryan!" effort.
Ohhkayyy... first of all what we ARE NOT going to do is come on MY thread with ballz a blazin!
I did pay attention to the podcast, let me just tell YOU, and I am well aware of what has been said by those interviewed! NOW.... we can discuss what we THINK and what we actually KNOW and try to fill in the blanks to hopefully come to a better understanding of what actually took place! I don't give a rats behind what Bo has said... and how very convenient that Ryan is sitting in jail and can't talk to anyone while Bo and his little band of... well his one idiot mouthpiece, are out there spreading BO's narrative.
About 3 more weeks or so. ☺️
"Bo and his little band of… well his one idiot mouthpiece" LOL. Also, I don't know when it happened, but Mrs. Conner had cancer at one time. I remember that because people were pissed that her husband had run around on her, and here she was, battling cancer. Now, these are personal matters for that family, but depending on when this was, it could somehow relate back to that fight at the bonfire people were talking about. jmo
Oh wow! Interesting undersea
Patience is a virtue supposedly
@osmosis..... when can we talk about the infrastructure?
What a diznick.
Anytime we have always tried to tie it back to a school issue into this it came to relations with other faculty members or corruption and backhanded deals which apart from the drugs / weapons precon was preaching seemed to be what precon wanted to get out there ? Thought my above statement might get that discusion kicked off and and get precon stop by and say hello 😉
Interesting that some probably trumped-up BS always distracted them away...
I'm pretty sure Nacho was just pointing out that there is some - albeit scarce and from our point of view, potentially flimsy at best - evidence that points to Ryan be responsible. Nacho seems to be very much a facts-man, not an emotions-man, and I agree with his statements pointing out that we shouldn't disregard any of the evidence or information that has been presented thus far. That being said, this place is a wonderful place to speculate and hypothesize and let our imaginations run wild - but it's a public forum, and everyone is welcome to an opinion. Something something about assholes and opinions? So just remember that when you're spit-balling up some interesting, hot new take, someone else might just chime in and bring you back down to reality. No need to jump down their throat over it.
So its said that they were trying to protect a loved one and draw the speculation away from them how much of that is truth is beyond me . everytime someone pieces together another peice of this they are bombarded with crazy and labelled a paynebot i firmly believe that to solve this crime all the gbi will need to do is tie phone records and calls from this group of boys to a parent / senior at an unreasonable hour and they will find out how this was able to be buried and be able to apply firm pressure and the rest will crumble
@IDW, I get what you are saying, but it's hard for me to take a Peterson fan seriously. I kid, I kid. But the facts in this case are few and far between. We have precious few. Even the charges against Ryan and Bo prove absolutely nothing until we get a conviction in a court of law. So yes, this discussion board is for speculation because even the so-called "facts" at this point are speculative.
Okayyyyy, this is where I step back in and say, leave S.C. out of your mouths... I promise you, she knew nothing about B.D.'s involvement...