upandvanished

Open full view…

The clothes

miss_bee
Tue, 09 Apr 2019 18:13:35 GMT

It doesn't make sense that RD stated that TG was clothed yet BD claims that when RD took him to the orchard, she was not clothed. Wouldn't RD have wondered where her clothes went? Little things like this in what RD said and then what BD said don't add up. Either RD lied or RD was not there when BD says he saw her and she was nude. In other words, RD had no idea that she was nude. The family of TG says that clothes were missing from TG home... shoes and sweat pants if I remember correctly. So, where are the clothes and why the discrepancy?

mrsmarple
Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:20:56 GMT

A logical reason the stories don’t match is RD said clothed because nude would imply sexual motive/assault which he is trying to cover up.

undersea_captive
Tue, 09 Apr 2019 21:09:40 GMT

👆🏽

juliet-1
Tue, 09 Apr 2019 23:33:11 GMT

Yep sorry peps Ryan is a liar. That has been shown fully without the trial even happening. So there’s that, his multiple versions that have been revealed.

hart24
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:18:49 GMT

To me its pretty clear tara was sexually assaulted. If the purpose was robbery the killer had in front of her a drawer full of jewelry as one of the court photos showed. Plus her cards were never used. Going to all the trouble and risk of breaking in just to steal some loose cash on her purse makes doesnt sound reasonable to me. I believe her clothing was thrown in the dumpster along with her purse and keys(earrings most likely inside purse). I believe the killer knocked her unconcious or at gunpoint removed from her house. i dont buy the strangling in the bed thing. When i saw the bed i just didnt get that impression. I believe she wad taken to the orchard alive and then the killer did whatever he wanted. After taking a break from the board and analyzing and re reading and re playing everything i think thats what happened.

first page
previous